Cefiderocol For Injection: Compatibility Testing Using the MINI-BAG Plus Container System and the VIAL-MATE Adaptor.

Background: Cost-effective and convenient modalities are required to facilitate the administration of antibiotics in hospital and outpatient settings. Objective: This study investigated the physical compatibility of the MINI-BAG Plus Container System and VIAL-MATE Adaptor with the 1 g drug product vials used for cefiderocol. Methods: Qualitative testing of the MINI-BAG Plus Container System (50 and 100 mL of 5% dextrose injection or 0.9% sodium chloride injection), using empty vials and vials containing lyophilized cefiderocol powder, was conducted in triplicate on MINI-BAGs that were hung and observed over 3 hours. Connection security between empty vials and the VIAL-MATE Adaptor was assessed in triplicate. Results: All predefined physical compatibility criteria between cefiderocol 1 g vials and the MINI-BAG Plus Container System were met, including a secure connection, successful multiple transfers of solution between vial and bag, successful reconstitution of cefiderocol, and lack of leaking into the vial or from the connections. There was no particulate matter in the prepared solution and no precipitation or discoloration. Secure connections between the VIAL-MATE Adaptor and cefiderocol vials were demonstrated. Conclusion and Relevance: Use of these systems is relevant even where resources are limited and may increase the efficiency of cefiderocol administration in hospitals, outpatient settings, or long-term healthcare facilities.

Systematic review of the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial antibiotic therapy on outcomes of patients with severe bacterial infections.

We investigated the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy on the clinical outcomes of patients with severe bacterial infections as part of a systematic review and meta-analyses assessing the impact of delay in appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase, conducted on 24 July 2018, identified studies published after 2007 reporting the impact of delay in appropriate antibiotic therapy for hospitalised adult patients with bacterial infections. Results were statistically pooled for outcomes including mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and treatment failure. Subgroup analyses were explored by site of infection where data permitted. Inclusion criteria were met by 145 studies, of which 114 reported data on the impact of appropriate versus inappropriate initial therapy. In the pooled analysis, rates of mortality were significantly in favour of appropriate therapy [odds ratio (OR) = 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.50]. Across eight studies, LOS was shorter with appropriate therapy compared with inappropriate therapy [mean difference (MD) -2.54 days (95% CI -5.30 to 0.23)], but not significantly so. The incidence of treatment failure was significantly lower in patients who received appropriate therapy compared with patients who received inappropriate therapy (six studies: OR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66) as was mean hospital costs (four studies: MD -7.38 thousand US$ or Euros, 95% CI -14.14 to -0.62). Initiation of appropriate versus inappropriate antibiotics can reduce mortality, reduce treatment failure and decrease LOS, highlighting the importance of broad­spectrum empirical therapy and rapid diagnostics for early identification of the causative pathogen. [Study registration: PROSPERO: CRD42018104669].

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Treatment on the Outcomes of Patients With Severe Bacterial Infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients with severe bacterial infections often experience delay in receiving appropriate treatment. Consolidated evidence of the impact of delayed appropriate treatment is needed to guide treatment and improve outcomes. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of delayed appropriate antibacterial therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with severe bacterial infections? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Literature searches of MEDLINE and Embase, conducted on July 24, 2018, identified studies published after 2007 reporting the impact of delayed appropriate therapy on clinical outcomes for hospitalized adult patients with bacterial infections. Where appropriate, results were pooled and analyzed with delayed therapy modeled three ways: delay vs no delay in receiving appropriate therapy; duration of delay; and inappropriate vs appropriate initial therapy. This article reports meta-analyses on the effect of delay and duration of delay. RESULTS: The eligibility criteria were met by 145 studies, of which 37 contributed data to analyses of effect of delay. Mortality was significantly lower in patients receiving appropriate therapy without delay compared with those experiencing delay (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.72). Mortality was also lower in the no-delay group compared with the delay group in subgroups of studies reporting mortality at 20 to 30 days, during ICU stay, or in patients with bacteremia (OR, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.43-0.76]; OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.27-0.80]; and OR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.40-0.75], respectively). No difference was found in time to appropriate therapy between those who died and those who survived (P = .09), but heterogeneity between studies was high. INTERPRETATION: Avoiding delayed appropriate therapy is essential to reduce mortality in patients with severe bacterial infections. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO; No.: CRD42018104669; URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Meropenem time above the MIC exposure is predictive of response in cystic fibrosis children with acute pulmonary exacerbations.

Meropenem exposures from 15 children (8-17 years old) with cystic fibrosis (CF) acute pulmonary exacerbation were analyzed to define the pharmacodynamic threshold required for a positive response. The primary endpoint was the relative increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (↑FEV1) between pre- and posttreatment. Meropenem pharmacodynamic indices (fT > MIC, fAUC/MIC, fCmin/MIC) over the first 24 h were estimated for each participant based on their individual parameter estimates and the isolated pathogen with the highest meropenem MIC. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common pathogen (n = 11/15). The mean ± SD ↑FEV1 was 18.8% ± 11.3% posttreatment. The mean (range) fT > MIC exposure was 63% (0-100%). An Emax model determined a significant relationship between fT > MIC and ↑FEV1 (r2 = 0.8, P < 0.0004). 65% fT > MIC was a significant predictor of response; the median (25th, 75th %) ↑FEV1 was 28.5% (22.2%, 31.7%) in those patients who achieved above 65% fT > MIC and 7.8% (1.1%, 12.6%) in those at or below 65% fT > MIC (P = 0.001). This is the first study in CF children to link meropenem exposure with a positive response as measured by ↑FEV1. Larger studies are required to confirm this exposure threshold.

Population pharmacokinetics of meropenem administered as a prolonged infusion in children with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: Meropenem is frequently used to treat pulmonary exacerbations in children with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the USA. Prolonged-infusion meropenem improves the time that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC (fT> MIC) in adults, but data in CF children are sparse. We describe the population pharmacokinetics, tolerability and treatment burden of prolonged-infusion meropenem in CF children. METHODS: Thirty children aged 6-17 years with a pulmonary exacerbation received 40 mg/kg meropenem every 8 h; each dose was administered as a 3 h infusion. Pharmacokinetics were determined using population methods in Pmetrics. Monte Carlo simulation was employed to compare 0.5 with 3 h infusions to estimate the probability of pharmacodynamic target attainment (PTA) at 40% fT> MIC. NCT#01429259. RESULTS: A two-compartment model fitted the data best with clearance and volume predicted by body weight. Clearance and volume of the central compartment were 0.41 ±â€Š0.23 L/h/kg and 0.30 ±â€Š0.17 L/kg, respectively. Half-life was 1.11 ±â€Š0.38 h. At MICs of 1, 2 and 4 mg/L, PTAs for the 0.5 h infusion were 87.6%, 70.1% and 35.4%, respectively. The prolonged infusion increased PTAs to >99% for these MICs and achieved 82.8% at 8 mg/L. Of the 30 children, 18 (60%) completed treatment with prolonged infusion; 5 did so at home without any reported burden. Nine patients were changed to a 0.5 h infusion when discharged home. CONCLUSIONS: In these CF children, meropenem clearance was greater compared with published values from non-CF children. Prolonged infusion provided an exposure benefit against pathogens with MICs ≥1 mg/L, was well tolerated and was feasible to administer in the hospital and home settings, the latter depending on perception and family schedule.

Antibiotic Stewardship Challenges in a Referral Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic overuse in neonates is associated with adverse outcomes. Data are limited to guide antibiotic stewardship in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Our objective was to identify areas for antibiotic stewardship improvement in a referral NICU. METHODS: Retrospective review of antibiotic use administered to infants admitted to a referral NICU compared with an inborn NICU. Antibiotic use was quantified by days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days (PD). RESULTS: A total of 78% of referral NICU infants received ≥ 1 course of antibiotics. Infants in the referral NICU received more antibiotic DOT/1,000 PD than in the inborn NICU (558.9 vs. 343.2, p < 0.001), with a higher proportion of broad-spectrum therapy. For infants in the referral NICU, 39% of antibiotic courses were started at the transferring hospital; these were broader in spectrum (28 vs. 20%, p < 0.001) and less likely to be de-escalated or discontinued at 48 to 72 hours (58 vs. 87%, p < 0.001) than courses started after transfer. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the inborn NICU, suspected sepsis in the referral NICU accounted for more antibiotic utilization, which was broad-spectrum and less likely to be de-escalated. Stewardship interventions should include reserving broad-spectrum therapy for infants with risk factors and de-escalating promptly once culture results become available.

Microbiological activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime, meropenem, and piperacillin/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from children with cystic fibrosis.

The activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam was tested against 50 nonduplicate Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 18 cystic fibrosis children collected in 2012-2014. These isolates were multidrug resistant with susceptibility to meropenem, ceftazidime, and piperacillin/tazobactam of 46%, 58%, and 50%, respectively. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was the most active with MIC50, MIC90, and percent susceptibility of 2mg/L, 8 mg/L, and 86%.

Probiotic-associated aspiration pneumonia due to Lactobacillus rhamnosus.

Lactobacilli are low-virulence, commensal organisms of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and are commonly used as "probiotic supplements." Herein, we describe an episode of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis with bacterial superinfection secondary to administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in an 11-month-old female with trisomy 21.

Safety and efficacy of simvastatin for the treatment of dyslipidemia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients receiving efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of simvastatin for treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who were receiving efavirenz-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), and to evaluate the effect of simvastatin when added to efavirenz on CD4(+) count, HIV viral load, and frequency of attainment of patient-specific National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III lipid goals. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Veterans Affairs health care system in Dallas, Texas. PATIENTS: Thirteen HIV-infected men who received a stable efavirenz-based HAART regimen concurrently with simvastatin 20 mg/day, and 19 HIV negative men who received simvastatin 20 mg/day (controls). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected before and after starting simvastatin. Reductions in lipid profile values in the HIV-infected group versus HIV-negative group were as follows: total cholesterol -20% versus -28% (p=0.15), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) -36% versus -41% (p=0.06), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL) -22% versus -33% (p=0.212), and total cholesterol:HDL ratio -33% versus -30% (p=0.26). These effects were seen without any documented adverse drug reactions or changes in viral and immunologic control. However, 28% fewer HIV-infected patients were able to achieve NCEP ATP III LDL goals compared with HIV-negative subjects. CONCLUSION: These preliminary comparative data suggest that simvastatin can be safely and effectively used to treat dyslipidemia in HIV-infected patients receiving efavirenz-based HAART without compromising viral or immunologic control. However, our results are suggestive of slight lessening of the LDL-lowering effects, which might be explained by the known reduction in simvastatin levels with efavirenz. Furthermore, fewer HIV-infected patients were able to meet their NCEP ATP III goals compared with HIV-negative controls, highlighting the difficulty in treating this population to current standards of care.

Multicenter evaluation of vancomycin dosing: emphasis on obesity.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data available regarding the dosing of antimicrobials in obesity. However, data are available demonstrating that vancomycin should be dosed on the basis of actual body weight. METHODS: This study was conducted at 2 tertiary care medical centers that did not have pharmacy-guided vancomycin dosing programs or other institutional vancomycin dosing policies or protocols. Patients who received vancomycin between July 1, 2003, and June 30, 2006, were stratified by body mass index and randomly selected from the computer-generated queries. Patients >or=18 years of age with a creatinine clearance of at least 60 mL/min who received vancomycin for at least 36 hours were included. RESULTS: Data were collected on a random sampling of 421 patients, stratified by body mass index, who met the inclusion criteria. Most patients in each body mass index category received a fixed dose of vancomycin 2 g daily divided into 2 doses (underweight 82%, normal weight 90%, overweight 86%, and obese 91%). Adequate initial dosing (>or=10 mg/kg/dose) was achieved for 100% of underweight, 99% of normal weight, 93.9% of overweight, and 27.7% of obese patients (P < .0001). Ninety-seven percent of underweight, 46% of normal weight, 1% of overweight, and 0.6% of obese patients received >or=15 mg/kg/dose recommended by several Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. Pharmacists also failed to correct inadequate dosing because only 3.3% of patients receiving less than 10 mg/kg/dose had their regimen changed in the first 24 hours of therapy. CONCLUSION: In this multicenter pilot study, obese patients routinely received inadequate empiric vancomycin using a lenient assessment of dosing. Greater efforts should be undertaken to ensure patients receive weight-based dosing because inadequate dosing can lead to subtherapeutic concentrations and potentially worse clinical outcomes.

Lipid-lowering efficacy and safety after switching to atazanavir-ritonavir-based highly active antiretroviral therapy in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and lipid-lowering effects after switching from a non-atazanavir-containing, protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) to atazanavir-ritonavir-based HAART in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). DESIGN: Multicenter, noncontrolled, retrospective study. SETTING: Three tertiary teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients with HIV infection, aged 18 years or older, who were receiving non-atazanavir-containing, protease inhibitor-based HAART that was switched to atazanavir 300 mg-ritonavir 100 mg-based HAART without changes in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and confounders known to alter serum lipid levels. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Lipid profiles measured 4 weeks-6 months before the switch, as well as follow-up lipid profiles measured 4 weeks-6 months after receiving the new HAART regimen, were evaluated. The switch resulted in the following changes in lipid levels: total cholesterol -9% (p=0.002), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol -13% (p<0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) -2% (p=0.431), triglycerides -23% (p=0.007), non-HDL -11% (p=0.002), total cholesterol:HDL ratio -10% (p=0.004), and triglyceride:HDL ratio -24% (p=0.019). A subgroup analysis was conducted on the lipid profiles of nine patients who still met the strict inclusion and exclusion criteria up to 9 months after the switch; it showed that the reductions in their lipid profiles were sustained. In addition, 33% more patients achieved their National Cholesterol Education Panel (NCEP) Adult Treatment Panel (ATP) III cholesterol goals. No significant changes were noted in median (interquartile range) CD4+ counts (372 [236-551] and 361 [217-464] cells/mm(3), p=0.118) or in number of patients with undetectable HIV viral loads ([defined as < 50 copies/ml] 32/36 and 31/36 patients, p>0.05) between baseline and after the switch, respectively. CONCLUSION: Switching to an atazanavir-ritonavir-based HAART regimen was associated with significant improvement in lipid profiles, similar to those seen in clinical trials, without compromising safety or viral and immunologic control. In addition, more patients were able to achieve their NCEP ATP III goals.